Software companies which have been involved in a process improvement programme according to ISO/IEC are showing an increasing interest in the . INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Information ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition ISO/IEC exemplar software life cycle Process Assessment.
|Published (Last):||18 July 2011|
|PDF File Size:||19.88 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This also enables suppliers to identify gaps between their current capability and the level required by a potential customer, and to undertake improvement to achieve the contract requirements i.
One of the requirements is to use a conformant assessment method for the assessment process. Retrieved from ” https: The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models.
This was expanded to cover all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor.
SPICE is still used for the user group of the standard, and the title for the annual conference.
In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
This has been for several reasons:. Each process attribute consists of one or more generic practices, which are further elaborated into practice indicators to aid assessment performance. Assessors write down the assessment results and notes supporting the assessment judgment. Ios organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step. The reference model defines a process dimension and a capability dimension. Following this improvement programme is not mandatory 15054-5 several alternative improvement programmes exist.
The rating is based upon evidence collected against the practice indicators, which demonstrate fulfillment of the process attribute. The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the lso assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate. With new parts being published, the process categories will expand, particularly for IT service process categories and enterprise process categories.
Views Read Edit View history. Safety extension van Loon, H. The first versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information.
In general, they are laid out to incorporate the assessment model indicators, including the base practice indicators and generic practice indicators. There exist several assessment tools. In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods. List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards.
The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: 15054-5 on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.
The specific problem is: This page was last edited on 12 Juneat January Learn how and when to remove this template message.