In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w.
|Published (Last):||19 December 2018|
|PDF File Size:||2.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is humorous, after all Climacus confesses that he is a humorist, yet, I believe it is an important text in which Climacus not only opposes modern speculative thought but gives critcal insight into different subjectivities while approaching the “religious” subject but never reaching or claiming himself.
I searched the web for commentary on this text as I read it and it seems as lhilosophical many people believe this text to be merely a humorous mockery of modern philosophical inquiry and not much else. Trivia About Conclufing Unscie Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 by Søren Kierkegaard
It then examines Kierkegaard’s arguments about God’s transcendence and revelation, faith and subjectivity. Michael Lloyd-Billington rated it really liked it Aug 02, No trivia or quizzes yet. Johannes Climacus means “John of the Ladder”; it is the sobriquet of a sixth-century abbot, author of the meditative guide The Ladder of Divine Ascent.
Finally — in a grand show of obedience to this same principle — the book ends by revoking itself in an appendix The distinction on which the above “incendiary sentence” pivots — that between subjective and objective concerns as criteria for authenticity — is in fact the key to the argument of the Postscript as a whole.
The necessity of this leap is what gives offense to man and to all philosophocal idealism.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Poetry and Poets: Kierkegaard really threw everything but the kitchen sink into this one. Is it more unacientific that a prayer be genuine with regard to matters of “objective” concern — i. This combination of gross objectivism and bottomless subjectivism represents a synthesis of logically irreconcilable, contradictory principles of thought, which is equally unfortunate from the point of view of philosophical consistency and from that ethical and cultural value.
In many ways, this book is necessary while also being provocative. The work is a poignant attack against Hegelianismthe philosophy of Hegelespecially Hegel’s Science of Logic. Jose rated it really liked it Dec 01, Luis rated it really liked it Nov 09, His early work was written under various pseudonyms who present their own distinctive viewpoints in a complex dialogue.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian’s peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity. In English, unfortunately, it is hard to parse the above translations without taking the words “to God” to be the effective referent of “in truth.
Then he steps back, prudently, from the scene. The upshot is that the identity of the prayer’s target is not irrelevant to its authenticity; it is simply far less relevant than is the quality of the prayer’s “how”. It means that existence and especially Christianity, or really any religion, are much more difficult than we make it out to be.
Scott rated it it was amazing Jan 09, Gary rated it really liked it Jun 18, Direct communication consists of statements pholosophical can be communicated and understood without appropriation, that is, philoskphical experiencing personally what is being communicated.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
Phillip Michael Garner rated it really liked it Jun 25, Jun 13, JP Martinez rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Its fruit is Kierkegaard’s Writingsthe comprehensively annotated Princeton edition of Kierkegaard’s complete works. Nov 09, Mark Ellis added it.
Read it, wrestle with it, and live inwardly as an existing person. Because only Kierkegaard could write postscript that’s pages longer than the actual book.
Gragments Journals Writing Sampler. David Downey rated it it was amazing May 21, Against Hegel’s system, Kierkegaard is often interpreted as taking the side of metaphysical libertarianism or freewillthough it has been argued that an incompatibilist conception of free will is not essential to Kierkegaard’s formulation of existentialism. But how cruel and false of you, I thought, if you use it to terrify others, perhaps upset every so many happy, loving lives that may unacientific well be truly Christian.
Eusebius Clay rated it it was amazing May 31, It cannot, then, be a surprise to see man more and more engulfed in the object, in things, in material being, in economic life, in technics, in a one-sided, quantitative manner of thinking, and in quantitative standards of value.
Open Preview See a Problem? Suellen rated it it was amazing Jun 25, Edna Hatlestad Hong Translator.